When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 14, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 16:30, at a “D” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, and the first floor; (b) at the time, he did not have any meals, and (c) asked the Defendant to be able to reach a full amount of meal; (c) however, the Defendant: (a) from that time, he expressed the Defendant a great desire to “I will have been discharged from chak gue meals,” the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business by force by avoiding a disturbance between about 50 minutes until 17:20 of the same day.

2. At around 17:10 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insulting G by publicly insulting the police officer G, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, to the police officer G, such as the aforesaid E, and three persons, who are working for the F District of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with three persons, including the aforesaid E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a point of interference with business) and Article 31 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;