However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 5, 2015, at around 02:00, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C’s business: (a) talked with the victim’s “D” restaurant operated in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) talked with the victim’s business by drinking the victim who was requested to calculate the drinking value after drinking and drinking alcohol at the “D” restaurant; and (c) talked with the victim’s “b) talking with the other customers who are on the side table,” who “Iskh, but slick, slick,” and talked to “Ishh, but Ishsh, slick, slick, etc., which were on the side of the table table, thereby interfering with the victim’s business restaurant business by force for about 30 minutes by driving another customers.

2. The Defendant insultd the victim by openly pointing out that “the victim E District Police Officer F sent out after receiving a report from C at the same time, time, and place as set forth in paragraph 1(1) and on the ground that “the victim E District Police Officer F was bad to listen to the horses,” and other customers are heard by C and other customers, the Defendant expressed that “the victim will not be able to do so by a police officer, a satis, a satis, a satis, or a satis.”

3. The Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer F’s breath with breath’s breath, hair breath’s breath and head breath’s hand on the ground that the breath was bad, and committing an act of assaulting a police officer’s lawful performance of duties relating to police officer’s security duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.