사인부정사용등
The judgment below
Among them, the acquitted part on the obstruction of business shall be reversed.
Each sentence shall be pronounced against the Defendants.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: ① In relation to the unlawful use by private persons and the above-mentioned events, according to F’s statement, etc., it can be acknowledged that the Defendants were aware that they did not obtain permission from F, the chairman of the Election Management Committee, but the official seal of the Election Management Committee is affixed thereto; ② In relation to the obstruction of business, the Defendants were able to recognize the fact that the Defendants continued to exist despite the request from H, who is the chairman of the said representative meeting, and thereby interfered with the business of the representative meeting by force; however, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendants of each of the
2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of ex officio appeal, prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal, the prosecutor applied for amendments to a bill of indictment with the purport of withdrawing the part of the facts charged regarding the obstruction of business, which is “huming” from among the facts charged as to the obstruction of business, and the subject of the judgment by this court was changed by granting permission. In this regard, the part of acquittal as to the obstruction of business among the judgment below cannot be
However, in the judgment of the court below, the prosecutor's assertion that the prosecutor's mistake was still subject to the judgment of this court even though there was a ground to reverse the above authority.
3. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts
A. 1) With respect to the unlawful use by private person and the exercise by the above investigator, the summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendants’ unlawful use by private person at the D Apartment-si Office around Southyang-si around October 14, 2013, and around that time, the Defendant A prepared a public notice to the effect that he would be present at the Dong representative’s dismissal of the E with the title “within the 106 representative E non-Confidence dismissal consent”; and (b) the Defendants may affix their seals to the Election Management Commission’s public notice from F, the chairman of the apartment management committee.