부당징계구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
The reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: " March 6, 2015" in Part 3, Part 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to " March 5, 2015"; " August 3, 2015" in Part 19 of the same part shall be changed to " August 13, 2015"; "Entry in Part 7, 10" in the part 10 and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance to "the testimony of the witness of the court of first instance"; "No. 5, 2015" in the part 10 and 11 of the same part shall be changed to "No. 22 of the judgment of the court of first instance"; "No. 40" in the part 11 of the same part shall be admitted to "No. 12 of the same part; and "each" in the part 12 of the same part shall be added to "each"; therefore, Article 8 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it.
(2) The court below's decision on the ground that the plaintiff's appeal is justified and dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. The ground for appeal by the court below is different from that asserted by the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal by the court of first instance is not different from the evidence additionally submitted by the court of first instance and the witness testimony by the court of first instance after considering the witness testimony by the court of first instance.