위증교사
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) excessively unreasonable.
2. Offense of perjury is a highly harmful crime against the State and society, such as hindering the proper exercise of the State’s judicial power, impairing the people’s trust in the judiciary and trial, causing unnecessary litigation and causing judicial expenses, and thus, requires strict warning to the Defendant. The fact that the Defendant recognizes all of the crimes and reflects the fact that the Defendant is already considered in the original judgment, and there is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing newly after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, the background and result of the crime, etc., do not seem to be unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.