The defendant.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner who registered the preservation of ownership on November 28, 2007 with respect to B B 204 Dong 805 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). The Defendant is the D Apartment Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project Association and the joint project executor as a purchaser of the apartment of this case in relation to D Apartment Rebuilding Improvement Project, including the apartment site of this case, and the Defendant is the owner of the apartment of this case and the constructor of the apartment of this case.

나. 원고가 이 사건 아파트에 입주한 직후인 2007년 겨울 무렵부터 이 사건 아파트 주방 싱크대에서 온수를 버릴 경우 싱크대 하수관이 지나가는 벽부분에서 ‘딱! 딱! 딱! ’ 하는 소리가 반복적으로 들리기 시작했다

(C) The Plaintiff’s act of dumping water from March 1, 2014 to April 1, 2014 led to the Plaintiff’s act of cutting down noise frequency (i.e., 9 to 29 times). The Plaintiff’s act of dumping water on the Plaintiff’s upper floor, which led to the Plaintiff’s act of cutting down noise frequency (i.e., the Plaintiff’s act of cutting down noise frequency).

C. The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the aforementioned circumstances for several years since 2009, and requested the repair of defects, etc., but the Defendant did not comply therewith.

Expenses for the removal of the foregoing noise generation are required to cover KRW 2,722,000 in the case of the pipeline construction work by reuse of a emitting range, water purifier, gas siren, etc. attached to the existing singing counter.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 (including paper numbers), the result of the appraiser E by the court of first instance, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

가. 원고의 주장 원고가 이 사건 아파트에 입주한 초기부터 싱크대에 온수를 버릴 경우 싱크대 하수배관 부분에서 “딱! 딱!” 하는 소리가 지속적으로 들렸고, 이러한 사정은 이 사건 아파트의 하자에 해당하므로 이 사건 아파트의 시행사인 피고는...