When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:00 on June 1, 2013, the Defendant committed assault by asking the victim’s left hand hand over the victim’s face while going up to the house of Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and the third floor victim D, with the victim D’s windows installed in adjoining areas, and sound to the Defendant would be able to make up for it. However, the Defendant committed assault by asking the victim’s left hand hand over the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witnesses D, E, and F to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On June 1, 2013, around 15:00 on June 1, 2013, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) at the house of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, and the third floor victim D, (b) had a window installed in adjoining areas, and (c) had a sound to be able to be able to the Defendant, and (d) committed assault by the Defendant on one occasion at the left eye of the D’s house.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in this part of the judgment, there are statements, opinions, copies of medical records, etc. in the courts and investigative agencies of D, E, and F.

First of all, it is difficult to believe that the part of the statement of D, which the defendant, among the statements of D, was attacked in the blue-dong coconcept, is inconsistent and ambiguous.

In addition, the victim's statement E is not only inconsistent with the victim's statement but also inconsistent with the victim's statement, and its own own lack of consistency, but also lack objectivity in light of the relationship with the victim.

Finally, the statement of police officer F sent to the site was made by the victim that the defendant had Cheongdong-dong cream, and was asked at the time of the victim or the victim was asked at the Cheongdong-dong cream.

state that there is no memory.