However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 1, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of C convenience stores located in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, Daegu, and was urged to return home from E in the circumstances belonging to the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu Police Station D District Unit, which was called up after receiving the above 112 report. However, the Defendant was able to raise the complaint and “I have to also enter the vehicle.”

C. During the embling theory “E.”, the Defendant assaulted the chest part of the above E by hand by brushing 2 times the chest part of the chest, flaps, and flabing the chest part of the E, one time the flab.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a person commits a misunderstanding and has no same military force) in the suspension of execution;