2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

A. The defendant is a legal entity operating an I Hospital located in H at Jeju (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Hospital"), and the plaintiff is a patient who received treatment from the defendant hospital due to the attending physician's seat, etc.

B. On June 4, 2012, the Plaintiff applied to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital by means of a cT test on the left side of the water. As a result, the Plaintiff’s medical team of the Defendant hospital conducted an cT test on the left side of the water, and conducted an cT test on the 11m left side of the 11m left side of the 11m left side of the 11m left side of the 6m left side of the 6m left side of the 6m left side. The medical team of the Defendant hospital conducted an cryptive test to the Plaintiff on the same day by using the cryptive crymatization for the crypology on the left side as a result of the test, and conducted an crypology 2g of the crypopical crypology on the part of the Defendant hospital, and conducted an crypology 2 once again on June 12, 2012, each of the 3rd 2012.2.

3) On August 7, 2012, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on August 7, 2012, due to the change in the total size of the absence from external shock so far as above, and the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital, but the absence was moved from the left-hand center to the left-hand new line, thereby re-explocing the external shock turbing re-exption instead of the above procedure. 4) On October 18, 2012, the Plaintiff confirmed that the absence, which was moved to the Defendant Hospital due to the extension of the left-hand line, was moved to the upper-hand line, and the re-explocing test was conducted five times after the re-expactation and the re-expactation of the external shock turction was conducted on five occasions after the re-expuling test and the re-exption of the outer turculing 2g after the 2g injection of the matetra.

C. On November 22, 2012, the Plaintiff 1, who generated the shock of this case and provided an emergency treatment, shall perform external shock and crushing surgery on the basis of the following reasons: (a) on November 27, 2012.