폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant does not have the following facts: (a) when the head of the victim D (hereinafter “victim”) was assembled in a document; (b) flaps of the victim’s head; and (c) flaps.
However, the judgment of the court below which recognized the crime of assault against the defendant is erroneous in mistake.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, the victim stated from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court to the effect that the Defendant took the victim’s head in the form of a document, and that E at the same time made a statement to the effect that he did not have the victim’s head in the document, and that E at the same time made the victim’s head in the court of the lower court’s judgment to the effect that “In this case, the victim made a statement to the effect that he was the victim’s head.” The victim made a statement corresponding to the victim’s above statement by stating that “the victim was the victim’s head.” The victim was the bad e., the victim’s head in the court of the lower judgment. The victim made a statement to the effect that he was the victim.
Therefore, the judgment of the court below that recognized the crime of assault against the defendant is just, and there is no error of misconception of facts as alleged in the grounds of appeal.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.