beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.07.14 2017고단253

제3자뇌물취득

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 15,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 8 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The status of the relevant persons and the background of the case, Defendant A was a public official of Grade VI in charge of the overall tasks of the cadastral reexamination conducted by H as a public official of Grade VI belonging to the Gun Office of G, Defendant B was a director of the cadastral surveying company of the “J” located in Nam Nam, and the said company was designated as a joint executor of the cadastral reexamination project with K around April 2015, and around April 2016, Defendant A was selected as a joint executor of the cadastral reexamination project with respect to L and M, and N was a final approving authority for various projects ordered by H as a public official of Grade VI in the local administration of the Gun Office, and P was a public official of Grade VI in the local administration of the Gun Office from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016.

2. Criminal facts;

A. Defendant B 1) On April 2015, 2015, the Defendant was selected as a joint executor of the K’s cadastral re-audit project on the Haman on April 2015, 2015, and then the J received advance payment from A without the head of the Gun, and did not approve the completion of the military number.

Does it be possible to personnel;

It is difficult to take an intermediate position even in the middle.

Recognizing the word “” and having the O head of the Gu receive money for the purpose of soliciting convenience so that advance payment of the above service costs can be carried out smoothly.

On April 27, 2015, the Defendant met A at a mutually influorous restaurant within Qu City on April 27, 2015.

“The phrase “,” and the pre-payment of the above business costs was 10 million won in favor of A in favor of N in favor of their convenience so that the pre-payment of the business costs would be carried out well-being.

As a result, the defendant delivered KRW 10 million to A who is a third party for the purpose of committing a bribe with respect to the duties of O head of Gun N who is a public official.

2) On April 8, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime around April 8, 2016, again against L and M by J as above.