If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2018. 10. 12. 14:00경 서울 동대문구 B에 있는 사귀고 있던 피해자 C의 집에 찾아가 피해자가 집을 비운 사이 그 곳 다락방으로 올라간 후 다락방에 보관되어 있는 피해자 소유의 24k 3돈쭝 금반지 2개, 3돈쭝 금목걸이 1개, 18k 금목걸이 1개, 18k 금팔찌 1개, 14k 금팔찌 1개, 24k 5돈쭝 금목걸이 1개, 14k 금알반지 1개, 18k 금알반지 1개 등 귀금속 9개 도합 5,600,000원 상당을 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Second police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused (including the C’s statement);

1. Application of a written statement of damage suffered by victims to statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant living together with the victim for a considerable period of time, and currently resides in the victim's house, and the victim appears to have claimed rather than the defendant's formal trial of this case, and the defendant and the victim's relationship are partly reduced by a fine prescribed in the summary order