However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 3, 2014, at around 00:30, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, asked the proprietor of the said inn with a room, and had the fluencing port that he would be melted by the victim D (year 41) while avoiding disturbance, the Defendant displayed a color plastic bag on one occasion the left part of the victim’s plastic bags.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 12896, Dec. 30, 2014); Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 10 months) (6) (6 to 6 months), basic area (6 to 10 months), [10 months] [1] of the Criminal Act] [1] The decision of sentence] committed the instant crime again despite the fact that the Defendant was punished for violent-related crimes; Provided, That the extent of damage to the victim is minor and the Defendant is divided and reflected against his mistake, and other various circumstances, including the motive, circumstance, means and method of the instant crime, circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character, experience, environment, etc., shall be determined as ordered by taking full account of the following circumstances.