However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from C cafeteria located in Switzerland-si B, Chuncheon-si, on the 13:25, that the customer was under the influence of alcohol; and (b) received a request to return home from C cafeteria E on the site, the Defendant used the victim’s desire to “gy, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, gym, etc. to the victim; and (c) assaulted the victim, such as gyming, gyming, and gyming, gyming

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning field measures by police officers according to 112 report.

2. On March 27, 2017, at around 13:40, around 13:40, the Defendant damaged goods for public use, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant arrested a police officer in a flagrant act suspected of interfering with the performance of official duties by the police officer, as stated in paragraph 1, in front of the C cafeteria B, Chuncheon, and thereby damaging goods used by a public office by: (a) the Defendant: (b) was arrested of the police officer under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties by the police officer; (c) the Defendant died or died of this Chewing; and (d) “Irh and her death of the driver; and (d) the Defendant, by walking the back of the F-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The photograph related to the case, investigation report (in the situation of on-site mobilization such as official duties related), investigation report (Attachment of video CDs related to the case taken by the police officer in charge of dispatch using a cell phone), video CDs;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the following factors:

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the protection and observation of the protection and Article 62-2 prevents the execution of official duties by cutting down the spath in a restaurant, by a police officer called upon receiving a report, and upon arresting him as an offender in the act of committing a crime, the police officer is walking the patrol vehicle.