beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.12.29 2015고단1480

국민체육진흥법위반(도박개장등)등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1480"

1. The Defendants’ violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (Gambling, etc.), Defendant A operated the “C” website, which is an illegal sports gambling site, and Defendant B is a person in charge of the duties of charging or refunding the betting amount in relation to gambling conducted at the above site.

No person, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation and a trustee, shall engage in any act of offering property or property benefits to those who win for the progress of sports or those similar thereto.

Nevertheless, on June 24, 2014, the Defendants opened a “C(D) site” from E, the manufacturer of the illegal sports soil site, and opened the post office account and the National Bank account from F and G respectively, and received money from the members of the above site from the members of the above site to the above F and G account, and predicted the results of the games, such as stable sports in Korea and overseas sports in Korea and abroad, from 5,000 won to 1,00,000,000 won per time. The Defendants issued the betting amount by multiplying the betting amount by a certain ratio, from June 24, 2014 to 1,000 won, and received money from the members of the above site through the information and communications network from June 24, 2014 to 208, and received money from the members of the above site to 30,000 won in total from 30,000 won in property, and paid money from each of the members who received money similar to the betting amount through the information and communications network.

2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by Defendant A shall transfer or acquire the means of access;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on August 2014, under the name of the “J” office operated by the Defendant-friendly I, who is a Defendant’s Ha in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and from G working as an employee.