Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge is not guilty.

『2014고단1754』 피고인은 2014. 2. 5. 서울 중구 D시장 E 상가 105호에 있는 피해자 F이 운영하는 G 앞에서, 주변 상가 상인 10여명이 지켜보고 있는 가운데, 전 날 피해자로부터 받은 문자내용을 촬영하여 인쇄한 사진 여러 장 및 피해자를 상대로 간통죄로 고소한 고소장을 펼쳐놓고, “F은 내 남편과 오랜 기간 동안에 걸쳐 약 200회 정도 간통을 한 년이다. 내가 이런 사실을 F에게 말하자 그 말을 들은 F은 남편에게 이런 사실이 알려질까 봐 2억 원을 들고 와 싹싹 빌면서 이 돈을 받고 내 남편에게는 절대 알리지 말고 용서해 달라고 했다.”라고 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of H and I prepared;

1. Certificates of receipt of complaint;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (a person who filed a complaint has been in in in a Buddhist relationship with the J, and the husband of the complainant knew of the above facts after having paid money, the complainant filed a lawsuit against the defendant for return of unjust enrichment against the said money, and the complaint was made to the defendant, which led the defendant to go against the defendant. While the defendant puts the above documents in a large envelope and sought to leave the complainant, the defendant did not work on the spot, but there was no place for the defendant to go against the defendant, and the surrounding merchants were to be resolved first with the defendant, and the surrounding merchants were to be resolved first with the parties, and the defendant did not appear to go to go to active action, such as provokinging or disturbing the spath, etc.).

1. The facts charged in this case.