강제추행
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
At around 01:30 on May 19, 2019, the Defendant divided conversations between the victim D (Woo, 35 years of age) and E in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Toilets for Women and Women's Use of the Space for Women and Women's Use of the River. “Around May 19, 2019, the Defendant heard the horses, and she committed an indecent act on the part of the victim in the manner that “Ashed the victim's breast part of the victim's chest outside of the column,” and “Ashedd the victim's breast part of the victim's chest, she committed an indecent act by force.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness D, F, E, and G;
1. CCTV video CDs;
1. The Defendant, at the time of the occurrence of the crime, denied the crime to the effect that there was no relation between the victim and the victim in the toilet, since one male, waiting outside the toilet, was first set out by one male, and that he was viewed as entering the toilet thereafter, and that there was no relation with the victim in the toilet.
However, according to the evidence duly admitted and investigated, the following circumstances are revealed.
① The victim's name of the offender who is memory was able to be able to be kept in chlosts and knished with color strings, and the victim was able to be meed next to it.
According to CCTV images taken by singing on the page at the time of the instant case, the Defendant, at the time, was found to have suffered sing-to-kicks and sing-kicks, with color-to-kicks, and the Defendant’s sing-to-kicks up to the door next to the Defendant’s appearance. Therefore, it is consistent with the offender’s appearance
According to CCTV images, even a man suffering a brightness cap and a knicker at the time coming in a singing room, it is completely different from the form of a criminal who is memoryd by the victim.
(2) Considering the following circumstances, it is difficult to see that there was a third party’s seal that is not caused by CCTV images:
On the other hand, the age group of the defendant is the same as the defendant, i.e., the upper age group of the defendant, the upper age group of the strings and the upper age group of the strings, and the mentmen are almost the defendant.