However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaged in the construction business under the trade name of “C”, the victim D (V, 62 years old) and the victim E (V, male and female) are simple, and the Defendant used to build the Fudio in Daegu North-gu, the victims newly constructed from around December 2, 2013 to February 27, 2014. The Defendant received KRW 9.5 million for personnel expenses for the said title work around September 2014, and demanded payment of KRW 18 million for materials expenses for the said title work, and the victims cannot recognize the Defendant’s additional materials expenses for the construction work, and there is a need for mutual appraisal.

1. On May 25, 2015, the Defendant used the force of force on the victim’s body in a way that the victim D, a dangerous object driven by the Defendant, who talked with the dong residents, uses the force of force on the victim’s body in a way that the victim was able to take a speed ped by the Defendant, a dangerous object driven by the Defendant, to talk with the dong residents. The Defendant used the victim to use the force on the victim’s body immediately before the victim was faced with the victim.

2. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 08, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant interfered with the victims’ studio construction work by force on the ground that the damage does not add the construction cost to KRW 18 million, the Defendant’s access roads in front of the studio construction site that the victims newly built to prevent the Defendant from entering into the hudio construction site by blocking the access roads in front of the hudio construction site.

B. At around 07:30 on May 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed a studio access road in front of the studio construction site in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) on the said ground, the Defendant: (c) obstructed the Defendant from entering the studio construction site into the H with a cubs car volume; and (d) prevented the Defendant from entering the other construction-related vehicles by force.