beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.11.06 2013고정1687

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who operates the "C" in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, and D is a worker who receives 50,000 won per day from the above A and takes charge of the management of the carbage and the guidance of customers at the above business place.

Meanwhile, there are E (n, 24 years of age), F (n, 21 years of age), G (n, 20 years of age), etc. as a female employee of the above business establishment, and women received KRW 20,000 per customer from the above A and served as a female employee.

The defendant from March 10, 2013 to the same year.

4. Until November 1, 200, when many unspecified male customers find in the above marina area, the above D received the price of KRW 40,000 per man and gave guidance to each family room, and the above E, F, and G had them shoot the diesel engine of the guest and use it with her hand and her hand, and had them do the act of similarity by having them do the situation.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D, E, F, G, or H;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Investigation report (on-site photographs, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing Internet outputs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have a significant social hazard, such as undermining human dignity, undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to severely punish the act of operating illegal sexual traffic establishments. Since the first crackdown, the Defendant was regulating the act of arranging sexual traffic in another time after the first crackdown, the size and type of business operated by the Defendant, the type of operation, the period of crime, the number of female employees, and the Defendant.