When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall make any indication or advertisement that is different from facts or exaggerated with respect to the nutritional value, raw materials, ingredients, and uses of foods or food additives.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from March 2013 to March 2015, indicated that “E” and “F” products at the D office operated by the Defendant in Namyang-si from March 2013 to March 2015 and indicated “8% of the raw materials of food” as “80% of the white water 80%, 10% of the black water 10%, 50, 500,000 won per 5% per 5%,” and indicated different facts from the fact as to the total raw materials of food sales from May 20, 2013 to May 20, 2013, and indicated “E” and “E” and “F” products to reduce the material costs. From May 20, 2013 to May 20, 2013 to March 18, 2015, the Defendant indicated the total amount of food 500 disease 30% per 60% per 360% per 80,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to the prosecution of I;

1. A report on investigation (attached a report on the results of examination of ingredients of mercury leaves and bovine spongiforms), and a report on the results of examination of ingredients;

1. Business report, food (food additives) item manufacturing report, certificate of origin, and trade statement;

1. Sovereign photographs of D factory site and printed materials of the F contents of the order, stored with Handphones;

1. Investigation Report (E’F’s details of sales of products and attaching product photographs), specifications of transactions, text files of Handphones and photographs, application of J’s photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 95 subparagraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and the latter part of Article 13 (1) and Article 13 (2) of the latter part of the same Act concerning the punishment of a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;