except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 6. 14. 16:50경 청주시 청원구 B에 있는 ‘C 대리점’에서 그곳 직원에게 휴대폰 요금에 대하여 항의 하던 중, 119신고를 받고 출동한 청주동부소방서 소속 구급대원인 소방관 D, E이 피고인의 손에 난 상처를 치료하려고 하자, "에이 씨팔! 니들이 뭔데 날 치료해!"라는 등 욕설을 하며 손으로 위 소방관들의 가슴 부위를 각각 1회 밀쳐 폭행하고, 위 대리점 밖으로 나가 청주시 청원구 F에 있는 ‘G식당’ 앞 도로에 뛰어들어 위 소방관들이 이를 제지하자, 피고인은 길에 드러누워 소리를 지르며 위 소방관들의 허벅지, 발 부위를 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning rescue operations and emergency medical services by fire fighters for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field visual images (fire fighters wabl video images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that D does not want the punishment of the defendant, the fact that it does not have a previous record except for one-time fine, the fact that it is against the law, and the fact that it raises a middle student's offspring by marriage);