beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.21 2016누31137

공무상요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the submission or addition of the following. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, "each evidence" in the fifth fifth and fourth fourth of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to "written evidence Eul," and "this court" in the same sentence shall be added to "the court of the first instance and the court of the first instance".

The following shall be added to the sixth tenthth judgment of the first instance.

【F) The Defendant asserts that “The status of the injury and disease of the Plaintiff No. 6-7 of the 300 square meters is merely “protruding signboards” and cannot be viewed as the medical name (protruding of the protruding signboards) applied by the Plaintiff.

However, according to the statement Eul evidence No. 7 and the result of the fact-finding on the head of the Korea National University Cancer Hospital in this Court, according to the type and degree of the flag's nuclear force, "flaging" is classified as "flaging," "flaging," "escing," "equation," and "equation". The "flaging" is the "flaging," "flaging," "ese, escape," and "glaging," so the situation in which the flag "flaging" should also be deemed as falling under the "flaging" escape certificate.

However, since the degree of the escape of the conical signboard No. 6-7 of the Plaintiff’s Gyeong-gu, the degree of escape of the conical signboard is “the status of the injury and disease in No. 6-7 of the Plaintiff’s Gyeong-gu, can be seen as falling under “the escape certificate of the Plaintiff’s Gyeong-7,” and on a different premise, the Defendant’s assertion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals by the plaintiff and defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.