물품대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion is a business operator who imports agricultural and fishery products and wholesale and retail business under the trade name of "C", and the defendant is a business operator who engages in wholesale and retail business of consumer products with the trade name of "D".
E is substantially operating “C” with the Plaintiff’s husband.
F is substantially operating “D” with the Defendant’s husband.
E and F agreed to sell net goods through a mail order brokerage company in the name of the Defendant, and deliver directly to the consumers who ordered the order in accordance with the details under the Plaintiff’s name when the order entered. The Defendant agreed to pay KRW 8,000 to the Plaintiff.
F deposited KRW 35 million in the name of the Defendant or the Plaintiff, out of KRW 73,646,200, the total supply price of 9,281 gambling sold through a mail order broker.
The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the remainder of the goods price of KRW 38,646,200 and damages for delay.
2. According to the statement Nos. 1 and 2 of the sales slip Nos. 1 and 2, the order and reply of the director of the tax office to submit the tax information, and the purport of the whole pleadings, only the third business operator (a seller) who is not the defendant (G) appears to be a seller of the transaction through the mail order broker, and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to deem the defendant as a party to the agreement and transaction of the plaintiff's assertion. Thus, the plaintiff's claim based on such premise is without merit.
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.