(a) deliver the buildings listed in the annex;

B. 3,900,000 won and from August 1, 2015 to the annexed sheet.

A. The Plaintiff, around 2004, leased the building indicated in the attached Form to the Defendant as KRW 100,000 per month without a deposit.

Since then, 200,000 won per month was raised in sequence, and the defendant did not pay 300,000 won paid on June 2, 2014 as the last one.

On July 28, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the lease contract on the ground of the delinquency in rent.

Accordingly, as the lease contract is terminated, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the building indicated in the attached Form to the Plaintiff and return the rent of KRW 3.9 million from July 2014 to July 2015 and the rent of KRW 3.9 million from August 1, 2015 to the delivery of the building.

B. Around 2004, the Defendant accepted the building by taking the lease of the building as stated in the attached Form from the outside-house Doomo, and then 8.5 million won.

The Plaintiff was not a lessor from the beginning, and D knew that around February 2014, the Plaintiff was aware of the Plaintiff as a purchaser, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant set the term of lease until December 30, 2016.

However, inasmuch as the Plaintiff or D did not have any document proving that it is the owner of the building indicated in the separate sheet, but had the Defendant enter the lease contract as if it were the owner, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed the lessor.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. There is no dispute over the fact that the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building was constructed without permission indicated in the attached Form on the part of the area of 2876.3 square meters owned by Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant is residing in the above building since 2

The defendant, from April 2013 to the plaintiff in an irregular manner, remitted 300,000 won per month to the plaintiff from April 2013, and did not finally transfer money to the plaintiff on June 2, 2014.

(A) At around 2001, the witness D, who is the defendant's mother, purchased the building indicated in the attached sheet jointly with the plaintiff, and leased it to the defendant in 2004, and the practical part is DNA.