If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 19, 2019, the Defendant issued a proposal that “The head of Tong and the cream card should be accumulated with a credit rating to obtain a loan due to low credit rating,” and then sent the physical card and password associated with the Defendant’s name-free bank account (C) to the above person in the name of Kwikset’s name-free service.”

Accordingly, the defendant would receive compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of remittance and account transactions;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of the provisional payment order is based on a comprehensive consideration of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the contents and circumstances of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, as set forth in the order.

The act of lending means of access is not only detrimental to the safety and reliability of electronic financial transactions, but also it is necessary to strictly cope with the risk of massing a large number of victims because it is used for other crimes.

The means of access leased by the accused was actually used for the fraud crime.

A favorable circumstance: The Defendant recognized the instant crime and did not repeat the same mistake.

Defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime in the past.