2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

2. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, it is recognized that the plaintiff paid KRW 30 million to the defendant on October 14, 2014, and KRW 10 million on December 22, 2014. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff paid KRW 2 million to the defendant on November 11, 2014, but the statement in Gap evidence No. 1 alone is insufficient to recognize it and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise. 2) Furthermore, although the plaintiff asserts that the amount paid to the defendant as above is the name of loan, it is difficult to prove that the plaintiff paid the above money under the name of loan to the defendant, or in full view of all the evidence and arguments presented by the plaintiff, taking into account the following circumstances:

(1) A person claiming a loan shall prove that there has been an agreement to return the money, and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff agreed to return the money to the defendant at the time when the plaintiff paid the money to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

② After paying the above money to the Defendant, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant’s residence and started living together.

The Plaintiff asserted that, around that time, a fire occurred in his own residence and that he was living together in the Defendant’s residence. However, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s living together with the Plaintiff on the sole basis of the occurrence of a fire in the Plaintiff’s residence is a sufficient reason for the Defendant to live together

③ The Plaintiff said that the Defendant would pay 500,000 won each month by operating studio Paf.