A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (ten months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the public prosecutor and the defendant, the defendant was raped through the window at the victim's residence, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had been placed on probation after obtaining an order to attach an electronic tracking device again after the execution of the above punishment was completed. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant again even though he had been placed on probation by obtaining an order to attach an electronic tracking device after the completion of the above punishment. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant's act of cutting off and cutting off the apartment berarara rail at the time when she was discovered to the victim F, and then it was invaded upon the victim's residence, and it was discovered to the victim F, so that the above victim was pushed off or blicked by the victim's arms to escape from arrest, and the defendant did not suffer any injury, such as cry pelf, which was considerably bad in quality, and it was hard to see that the defendant had made an interview with the victim during the process of the crime of this case, and submitted the victim's grhe life and she did not have made an agreement.