When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:40 on December 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a claim from the victim D, an acting engineer, for the reason that the Defendant’s daily act, did not immediately depart from the place of happiness; (b) brought about a dispute with one another; and (c) caused the Defendant by plucking, plucking, plucking, etc., of the first bones of the bones for about five (5) weeks of damage to the victim by plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of his finger, which requires the victim’s treatment for about five (5) weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement asserts that the defendant's act constituted self-defense. The defendant's act is legitimate in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence: (i) the victim D has consistently made an investigation agency to this court; (ii) the victim suffered bodily injury from the defendant around 23:40 on December 31, 2014; (iii) the victim suffered bodily injury from an investigative agency on January 1, 2015; and (iv) the date was examined by the investigative agency on January 2, 2015; (iii) the defendant's act of self-defense is hard to recognize the defendant's act of self-defense; and (iv) the defendant's act of self-defense is not sufficient to recognize the defendant's act of self-defense; and (v) the defendant's act of self-defense is not sufficient to recognize the defendant's act of self-defense; and

1. Legal statement of the witness D, and part of C’s legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant (including D's statements)

1. C.