beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.07.09 2018가단123987

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant A delivers real estate Nos. 1 in the annexed real estate list;

B. Defendant B shall be in annexed Form.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of improving national housing life and efficiently using national land by performing the construction, supply, management, etc. of housing.

B. The Plaintiff leased each real estate listed in the separate list of real estate, the type of rental housing under Article 2 of the former Rental Housing Act is public construction, to Defendant A, B, C, and DongF (the deceased on June 4, 2010, Defendant D, and E’s decedent) maintaining the occupancy eligibility of national rental housing (such as a non-house owner, asset holding, income, and requirements for restricting the scale of housing on a single-household basis).

The term deposit for the contract date of the Defendant 1 A on December 30, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant 1”) shall be as follows: (a) on July 30, 2015; (b) on June 30, 201; (c) on June 30, 2015; (d) on June 13, 201; (e) on June 13, 2017; (e) on June 13, 2017; and (e) on May 2018, 2012: (e) on May 10, 2012; (f) on March 10, 2003; (f) on June 18, 2012; (f) on June 18, 2014; (f) on November 15, 2011;

C. A lessee accepts the terms and conditions of a lease deposit, rent, etc. determined by a lessor and notifies a lessor of his/her intention to renew the lease contract no later than one month before the expiration of the lease contract term (Article 1(1) of the Special Conditions for the Contract), “Where a lessee leases a rental house by fraud or other improper means,” or “where a lessee owns another house during the lease term of a publicly constructed rental house constructed with approval for a project plan under Article 16 of the Housing Act” is a ground for cancellation

(General Terms of Contracts No. 1, No. 1, No. 7) of the General Terms of Contracts

However, even though Defendant B, C, and network F or F’s heir, Defendant D and E did not notify the Plaintiff of the intent to renew the lease contract even after the lease term expires.

Meanwhile, Nonparty G, the wife of Defendant A, obtained H apartment I on December 12, 2013 due to the sale on November 26, 2013, and transferred ownership to the Nonparty on December 12, 2013 due to the sale on November 27, 2013.

【Evidence A, D, E: Evidence A, No. 1 to 3.