파면등처분취소
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 12, 200, the Plaintiff is a public official of the prosecution who was appointed as the Grade IV prosecutor on May 12, 200 and promoted to the Grade VII prosecutor on September 1, 2012.
From November 17, 2014 to January 22, 2017, the Plaintiff served in the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office, from January 23, 2017 to January 28, 2018, and from January 29, 2018 to the branch office of the branch office of the Chuncheon branch office of the branch office of the branch office.
On November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff appeared as a witness of the instant criminal trial to the Cheongju District Court.
The plaintiff falsely testified to the question of "five times or more that he confirmed the installation of CCTV at the Fhouse" of the defense counsel's "I wish to answer the question of "I would like to kill the CCTV files at the police station of today's length," "I would like to kill annoyingly."
B. On November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff appeared and testified as a witness of Defendant E’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “instant criminal trial”).
On July 17, 2017, the Defendant issued a one-month suspension disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 63 of the State Public Officials Act by perjury in the instant criminal trial (hereinafter “instant suspension disposition”).
C. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim G on February 1, 2018; (b) committed an indecent act against the victim’s residence; and (c) committed an indecent act by force against the Plaintiff on the part of the victim; and (d) subsequently, (c) removed the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 63 of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant removal”).
1. On February 1, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) completed a meeting held in front of the restaurant located at the Seocho-si (H on February 1, 2018; and (b) boarded with the passenger G (n, 29 years of age, Ga) operated by the said personnel in order to return home; and (c) she boarded with the victim G.