If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven the vehicle B; (b) driven the vehicle on July 17, 2012; (c) driven the vehicle in front of the vehicle in the Southern-dong of Busan; and (d) there was a duty of care to not operate the vehicle by a sidewalk; (c) despite the fact that there was a duty of care to not operate the vehicle by a sidewalk, the Defendant received the victim C (V, 52 years old) who was on the sidewalk on the sidewalk in order to cut the crosswalk due to the negligence after the sidewalk while neglecting the duty of care as above, and caused the victim’s injury, such as salt, fluor, etc. of the trine that requires treatment for two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. 교통사고보고⑴⑵ 실황조사서, 각 교통사고발생상황진술서

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and 3 (9) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;