When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives as a duty a bit channel C truck owned by a corporation.

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 17:00, while driving the front side of the E in D, which led to the speed from the inside side of the vehicle to the nutritional speed.

At the same time, if the line to reduce the other vehicles has been under normal progress with the hub section of one lane, the driver shall keep his/her own bus line well and shall not drive in such a speed or manner as to inflict any danger or harm on other persons according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle by accurately operating the steering system, brakes and other devices, and shall not, in particular, inflict any harm on other persons or cause any danger to traffic continuously or repeatedly, by engaging in at least two of the acts, such as signal breach, central bed, violation of prohibition against change of course, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant's attempt to promptly go ahead of it by intentionally over three times without a justifiable reason, leading to the median line.

The F driver G(39 years of age) and H driver(48 years of age), the gallon, and the Jgallon driver K(28 years of age), which are the front vehicle, carried out a sudden driving, such as threatening or endangering a large number of unspecified vehicles, such as the F driver G(39 years of age) and the H driver(48 years of age), the gallon(28 years of age), and causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

I and G’s respective written statement statement of the police driving license (suspect), investigation report (road structure and situation at the time of scambling) on the criminal facts covered by the law, and the reason for sentencing of Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order of the Provisional Payment Order of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the crime of this case on the ground of Article 151-2 and Article 46-3 (Selection of Fines) of the Road Traffic Act for the crime of this case is unreasonable.