When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 16, 2015, from around 20:40 to 20:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was towing the Category D taxi vehicles owned by the Defendant in Suwon-si B without prior contact; (b) when the victim E and Si expenses came to the victim E and the Defendant, seven monitors installed in the said office’s skes were carried out by cutting the server over the hand floor, thereby interfering with the victim’s business by avoiding disturbance of about 10 minutes.

2. The Defendant destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 152,00 in the amount of damage, such as the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at the same time and at the place, breaking a computer monitor for the said reasons, breaking the monitor, and destroying the tables glass.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Written estimate of damage;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50, and the proviso to Article 42 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;