특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person engaged in driving C-Scar cars.
On December 8, 2013, 16:30, the Defendant changed the course to two lanes from the E point ahead of the E point of view in Jinju City D, to the speed of the Si in the direction of the City of the City of the City of the City of the City of the City of the City of the Vinju.
Since there are frequent traffic at all times, there was a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to change the lane safely by keeping the traffic situation of the front left left and right left well.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the two-lanes to the right side of the Defendant, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to change the two-lanes from the two-lanes to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, which is the back of the driver’s seat of the victim F (36 years of age) who stops in the signal atmosphere.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the clify that requires medical treatment and stability for about three weeks, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
Summary of Evidence
Although the defendant is denied by the defendant at the time of the accident, when the victim called " how to see the situation where she would be left at the time of the accident", the defendant can be recognized that she would drive a vehicle to the Sejong Hospital in accordance with the progress signal in order to conceal the fact of driving under his/her influence. Thus, it is reasonable to see that the defendant was aware of the fact of the accident of this case even if she is dolusent, and the part of innocence below is acquitted.
2. The meaning of judgment
A. In light of the relevant legal principles, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant was in need of taking measures to rescue the victim after the accident.
1..