However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 25, 2012, around June 25, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C that “I would pay her interest even if I lend money, I would like to say, “I would like to pay her interest without molding the interest. I would like to say that I would like to say that I would like to pay her interest even if I would like to pay her interest. I would like to say that I would like to say that I would like to say that I would like to say that I would be the head of the department in which I would be the head of the department, and that I would like to say that I would have she would be the attorney. I would like to accept 100 million won

However, the defendant's husband and children were not public prosecutors or lawyers, and the defendant did not have been awarded the apartment contract at the time of auction, and the defendant did not have any specific property or income and did not have any intent or ability to repay the apartment even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant received 15 million won in cash from the victim in the name of the borrowed money from the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 30, 2013, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around January 30, 2013, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “The husband of the family is the same as the husband of the family of Korea, and the husband of the family of Korea is the same as the husband of the family of Korea. If a friendly Gu needs to establish a large-scale house of electric power resources, if the friendly Gu lends money, it will pay interest to the bank and pay the principal immediately.”

However, in fact, her husband was a prosecutor, there was no friendship that constructs a house for all at the time, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim due to no particular property or income, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant received 15 million won in cash from the victim in the name of the borrowed money from the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor under Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act;