투자금반환
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted to the court of first instance is acknowledged as being the fact that the plaintiff's representative C and the defendant's representative director D have reversed the document authenticated by the investment contract of this case and replaced by the loan certificate, but it does not seem to have any circumstance that actually destroyed the investment contract of this case or prepared the disposal document, such as the loan certificate. However, even if the above conversation is not sufficient to recognize that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to terminate the investment contract of this case or agreed to return the investment amount of KRW 50 million, the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are legitimate.
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.
The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.