2. Although there are circumstances such as the fact that the defendant previously contributed to the State while serving as a public official, the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant's perjury appears to have a significant influence on the trial of the relevant case, the amount of embezzlement of the defendant is considerably heavy, and the damage therefrom is not repaid, the act of perjury, such as the crime of this case, is in need of strict punishment as it harms judicial order, and all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, occupation, circumstance and contents leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.