However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 16:00 on September 2, 2017, the Defendant talked about the Defendant E (54 years) and property issues at the Defendant’s house located in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, the Defendant continued to gather the Defendant’s softens that he was faced with the Victim E (54 years of age), and continued to inflict the Defendant’s fright, which is a dangerous object that the damaged Defendant would have to go to the Defendant, and caused the damage to the victim’s breath and string the breath’s breath, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by destroying the breath’s flaps.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A partial occurrence of the violence;

1. Vehicles booms, stuffs, photographs, and images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (referring to the statement by telephone F and refusal of a request for attendance of a person with a wooden shooting level F);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Claims by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The gist of the assertion was that the Defendant intentionally did not left the victim’s remains.

Although there is a fact that the defendant cited hurd and threatened the victim, there is no fact that the victim inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged in the state of improvement.

2. Comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s partial statement, the legal statement of the witness E, the written diagnosis of the injury, the photo on the part of the injury, and the background and method of the crime revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the victim’s injury parts and degree, and the situation before and after the crime, etc., the fact that the Defendant intentionally saw the victim’s flab, and thereby inflicted damage on the victim’s flabing and flabing the flabing, which are dangerous things, may be sufficiently recognized.

Defendant

We do not accept the assertion of counsel.

3. Seven jurors' verdicts (seven jurors).

(a) special injuries -.