However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Cknife.

On June 23, 2015, the Defendant driven a car with the upper knife around 21:10 on June 23, 2015, and led to the passage of the first two-lane road in front of the Do D located in the Gun, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, to the front direction from the security room.

At the time of night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the steering gear and operating the steering system properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and followed the Defendant’s negligence before and after driving the car driving direction, received the part of the Victim F (the age of 65)’s body located at the right edge of the road from the front side of the car driving to the right edge of the road.

Ultimately, around 00:40 on June 24, 2015, the Defendant caused the victim’s death by occupational negligence from the Gicheon University Hospital located in 895, the Gicheon University Hospital located in Donsan-si, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do to the external shock shock by the Daun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Each investigation report (34 pages, 48 pages, 49 pages), and report on the results of an investigation;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field evidence photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that a traffic accident caused by the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence has resulted in the result that the victim's death is disadvantageous to the defendant, or that the defendant has committed the instant crime, and is in depth against the defendant, the vehicle in the instant case has been subscribed to a comprehensive automobile insurance, and the defendant's bereaved family members do not want the victim's punishment by agreement with the victim's bereaved family members.