However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person driving a Cgner vehicle.

On November 15, 2012, 00:23, the Defendant made a turn to the left at an indefinite speed from the upper south Library's bank to the waterside of the soil and the deep apartment complex.

However, there was a duty of care to safely drive according to the traffic signal by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the person engaged in driving along a private street crossing where the signal, etc. is installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left even though the vehicle driving signal was straighten signal, and received the full part of the victim D(18 years old) driving without registration 250cc U.S. driving, which was driven by the three-lanes of the 3-lane, corresponding to the mastif signal, from the negligence of left to the left while the vehicle driving signal was straighten signal, as part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving schedule.

On November 15, 2012, the Defendant caused the death of the victim D, who is the driver of the above Oral Ba in occupational negligence, at the emergency room of the Sungwon-si E Hospital in the Changwon-si, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, where he was under the follow-up treatment at around 01:15 on November 15, 2012, and at the same time suffered injury, such as a fladation of flads, which requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment to the victim F (the flads of age 17).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. On-site photographs and booms-flaf photographs;

1. A traffic accident report (1), (2);

1. A written result of autopsy;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "contributative circumstances") is that the occurrence of a death and a serious traffic accident, one of which is serious, is very serious, due to the defendant's breach of his duty of care.