If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around December 2012, the Defendant: (a) entered the written form of the written confirmation of work personnel in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Apartment 405 Dong 106, and signed it in C’s name.

By doing so, the Defendant was named C, a private document concerning a certificate of fact for the purpose of uttering on February 26, 201;

2.27.27.

2. 28. 28. A copy of the Certificate of Work Manpower was forged.

2. Around December 2012, the Defendant: (a) issued a forged document to the Seoul Northern District Court 2012Gau285976, which was aware of the forgery; (b) as if the document was a document duly formed, the Defendant used the forged document as a document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of a copy of a forged certificate of work human resources;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;