2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and his mistake was divided; (b) there was no particular force except the punishment of a fine once for the crime of this type; and (c) the business period was not long.

However, in light of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that it is necessary to keep the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and establish a sound sexual culture, and other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and happiness environment and circumstances before and after the crime, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.