On February 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:50 on 17:50 on 14, 2017, the victim D(62) of the victim D(62) who was under drinking alcohol did not drinking the Defendant; (b) the victim’s disease, which was a dangerous object on his/her customer, was collected at a time, once again; (c) the victim’s back water was fluored with the victim’s back water; and (d) when the victim’s back water to the back water with his/her hand, the victim got the victim’s back water to the back water with his/her back water, and then the victim sustained the victim’s back water with his/her back water, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the diver heat of the left-hand finger, which requires treatment for about 14

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1792" is a resident of the E Apartment 101 Dong 1201, and the victim F (59 years old) is a facility technician of the above apartment.

On March 2, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:05, sustained two weeks of the head of the victim due to the injury of the victim, on the ground that the victim, while drinking alcohol like the victim, was not subject to the personal phone, the Defendant, at around 102 Dong 1003, G, the residence of the resident G around 20:05, and on the ground that the victim did not have the personal phone.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1187"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Certificates of witnesses in H, I, and J preparation;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs and a written diagnosis of injury "2017 Highest 1792";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a photograph and bodily injury certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The sentencing criteria are not set in the case of special injury for reasons of sentencing in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravated concurrent crimes;

In the short term, each of the crimes of this case was committed two times in the short term, the degree of injury of victims is not less severe, the victims' damage was not recovered most (depositing KRW 200,000 for the victim F), and it did not reach an agreement, and the defendant recognized and reflected the facts of the crime of this case.