When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:55 on July 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant 112 was under influence of alcohol at the front of the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, 125 Doz. 21, the Defendant: (b) reported that the Defendant was under influence of alcohol; (c) the position of the Goyang Police Station B Zone B, who called the site; and (d) the police officer called “weaking, sweaking, sweaking,” without any reason, that he was under the influence of drinkinging her home; and (c) the Defendant was under the influence that he was under the influence of drinking her, and was under the influence that he was under the influence of drinking her.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which appears to be contingent crimes, is not very serious, and the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties, is not very serious, and the defendant repented of errors and did not have past records to be taken into account in this case, and the defendant has yet to be young, specifically selected a fine and sentenced to a sentence.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.