청구이의
1. The Defendant’s decision on the acquisition money case against the Plaintiff was based on the Daegu District Court Branch Decision 2018 Ghana40202.
1. Indication of Claim: The Defendant, based on the judgment entered in the order, received the Jeju District Court Decision 2019TTTTT 5279 and conducted compulsory execution against the Plaintiff upon the issuance of the seizure and collection order, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 466,660 to the Defendant on November 28, 2019. Therefore, compulsory execution based on the judgment entered in the order against the Plaintiff should be rejected.
2. Applicable legal provisions: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) and the main text of Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the defendant only submitted a written reply to the purport that he/she simply seeks dismissal by asserting a violation of jurisdiction with the service of the complaint of this case and claiming a violation of the jurisdiction. This court did not receive any additional assertion from this court that "where the plaintiff's assertion is asserted as a substantive reason, it shall be called delivery of specific arguments and evidence," and did not appear on the date for pleading, and therefore, the plaintiff did not appear on the date for pleading, and therefore, all of