beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.09.19 2018구합22748

정보비공개결정처분 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to six years of imprisonment by the Daejeon High Court for violating the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act on December 8, 2015, and the sentence became final and conclusive on December 8, 2015, and was transferred from the Busan Correctional Institution to the North Korean Correctional Institution on April 20, 2016, and is currently being admitted until now.

B. On February 23, 2018, the Disciplinary Committee on the Third Correctional Institution (hereinafter referred to as the “Disciplinary Committee”) decided that the following acts committed by the Plaintiff constituted Article 107 subparag. 5 of the Administration and Treatment of Correctional Institution Inmates Act and Article 214 subparag. 14 and 17 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act for 30 days of forfeiture. On the same day, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for 30 days of forfeiture (including the investigation period of 10 days, from February 23, 2018 to March 14, 2018) in accordance with the resolution of the said Disciplinary Committee.

1. At around 08:30 on February 2, 2018, the Plaintiff talked with the issue of drinking by dividing the Plaintiff’s Da and the purchased goods into the B room, and it would be urgent to set off the Plaintiff’s ambling room on the floor of the Plaintiff’s ambling, and a dispute occurred. The Plaintiff’s ambling of the Plaintiff’s ambling, “I will see the same son’s son, imprisonment, and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

2. On February 13, 2018, when the Plaintiff had been equipped with appraisal for the foregoing case, the Plaintiff d’s employees in charge of the training site for industrial facilities around 10:00 reconciled 6 World Cups to the employees in charge on February 2, 2018.

3. On January 14, 2018, the Plaintiff reported false facts to the Defendant. (C) The Plaintiff did not implement the food call system from around January 14, 2018. The Plaintiff’s meeting record of the disciplinary committee held on February 23, 2018 (the part excluding the information pertaining to an individual, which, if disclosed, could infringe on the confidentiality or freedom of privacy).