Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

On March 3, 2017, the Defendant, in front of the Daegu Viewing Office entrance in Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 88, provided a degree of study on the right bridge, went through a wheeler, and went through a wheeler and the head of Daegu Viewing D, on the ground that the Defendant did not resolve civil petitions such as reduction of membership fees, etc. before the Daegu Viewing Office entrance in Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 88, the Defendant was responsible for the credit.

The indictment refers to a large sound, and the defendant stated the above E in the written indictment “Is the word “Is the word,” but the above part is a clerical error that the Daegu Market refers to E, which is written in writing (Evidence No. 12 pages of the Evidence No. 12 of the Evidence No. 12 of the Evidence No. 12 of the Evidence No. 1). The defendant takes back 1.5 liters who are prepared in advance, in the vicinity of the wheelchairs et al.

In addition, it caused sub-competence such as intending to attach one's own head and intending to do so.

Accordingly, Defendant F, etc., who was found to have attempted to restrain the above Defendant’s act, committed an assault with F, such as breaking a f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s chest, face part, etc., and obstructed the lawful performance of duties regarding the F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendations] The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [the scope of punishment / [the scope of recommendations] / (1 year to 4 years)] in the area of aggravation (1 year to / 4 years to obstruct the performance of official duties) / (1) in the case where a group or a large group of forces or carries dangerous things / (1) / [the decision of sentence] in the case where a defendant tried to put a new or new person prepared in advance on his/her head for the reason that he/she did not solve a civil petition, and the case where the police assigned for special guard F who prevented him/her from taking violence into account the law of crime and danger.