1. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle at approximately 300 meters, without obtaining a bicycle license, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.162% from the backhead of the early sea water side, which is located in the west-do of early early high speed, at around 16:00, to the front day of the summer-do of the same sea water, from the front day of early high speed, to the front day of the 161st day of the same sea water.

2. The Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D(62) with no usual appraisal at the above time and at the above place; (b) laid the victim’s letobbbal safety mos that had been worn, took the victim’s bath to the victim; (c) laid the victim’s humbal, kid the victim’s humf, flading the dangerous articles at the place; (d) flading the victim’s humf, flading the victim’s humf, flading the victim’s humf, cutting down the victim’s humf, and cutting down the victim’s humbal at the bottom.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. A report on investigation (Submission of a written diagnosis of a victim D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on special violence-related photographs;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking), Article 154 subparagraph 2, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license) and Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor (or a violation of traffic laws on roads);

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the mistake; and (b) the degree of injury was not significant; (c) the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim; and (d) the victim was not recovered from damage. < Amended by Act No. 14020, Jan. 2,