If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 16:20, at Hrovia in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the civil petition was not properly processed; (b) the Defendant was unable to process the civil petition on the ground that he did not properly process the work; (c) the Defendant’s “I and J interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the guidance of civil petitions and the maintenance of order of J and J, by assaulting the part of the J to go beyond the upper bottom of the Y,” which is a public official of the above H operation support and public official of the H, and I and J, on the ground of the security of the I and J, who attempted to go against the elevator in order to come up with the H. The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the guidance of civil petitions and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the statutory statements made by witnesses I, J and K to the relevant statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.