출국명령처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, a foreigner of Canada’s nationality, entered the Republic of Korea on September 29, 2005 with his/her entry and departure from the Republic of Korea, repeated entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea on March 25, 2008, and was staying after obtaining permission for change to his/her sojourn status on March 25, 2008, and entered the Republic of Korea on March 11, 2010, and continued entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea on March 3, 2011 as professor (E-1) sojourn status on March 11, 201, and continued entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea on March 19, 201, and continued entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea on April 1, 2013 with the Tourism House (B-2) status on September 21, 2015, while re-entry into the Republic of Korea on September 21, 2015.
B. However, on January 22, 2014, the Plaintiff: “The Plaintiff did not subscribe to mandatory insurance on August 10, 2013, and was under influence of 02:207% of blood alcohol content, at around 10:15, the Seoul Western District Court (2013No. 2846); the Plaintiff’s dismissal of the Defendant’s charge of the violation of the Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Act (the Seoul Yongsan-gu Road Traffic Act No. 12500, Jun. 10, 2014; the Defendant’s dismissal of the Defendant’s charge of the violation of the Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Act (the Seoul Yongsan-gu Road Traffic Act No. 1253, Jun. 10, 2013) with the lower end of the 125cc sib, which was transmitted while driving the 125cc sib, and attempted to violate the Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Act No. 1044, Jun. 10, 2013).
C. Article 11 of the Immigration Control Act is applicable to the Defendant on March 4, 2016 on the ground of the facts constituting the crime under the above paragraph (b).